Bind creates a new function that will force the this inside the function to be the parameter passed to bind(). Here's an example that shows how to use bind to pass a member method around that has the correct this:
In a nutshell, .bind() returns a new function that when called will call the original function with a specific this value and (optionally) some new arguments preprended to the argument list.
The one liner : bind() to own address, connect() to remote address. Quoting from the man page of bind() bind () assigns the address specified by addr to the socket referred to by the file descriptor sockfd. addrlen specifies the size, in bytes, of the address structure pointed to by addr. Traditionally, this operation is called "assigning a name to a socket". and, from the same for connect ...
std::bind was voted into library after proposal to include boost bind, primarily it is partial function specialization where-in you can fix few parameters and change others on fly. Now this is library way of doing lambdas in C++. As answered by Steve Jessop Now that C++11 supports lambda functions I don't feel any temptation to use std::bind ...
bind() defines the local port and interface address for the connection. connect() does an implicit bind("0.0.0.0", 0) if one has not been done previously (with zero being taken as "any"). For outgoing connections, this is generally acceptable and preferred. The OS will simply bind to "all interfaces" and pick some high-numbered, unused port. You only need to bind on the client if the server ...
The @bind:get modifier specifies the value to bind to, and the @bind:set modifier specifies a callback that's called when the value changes. The questions are: What is the difference between @bind:after="PerformSearch" and @bind:set="PerformSearch"? Both of these seem to call the PerformSearch after the searchText is changed. Where is the use ...
When updating to the latest macOS operating system, I was unable the docker to bind to port 5000, because it was already in use. (You may find a message along the lines of Port 5000 already in use.) By running lsof -i :5000, I found out the process using the port was named ControlCenter, which is a native macOS application.
Will it bind to both simultaneously? (3) Is it actually true that binding to 127.0.0.1 prevents other systems from sending me packets from a security standpoint? Can't they manually send a packet that specifies that as a bogus IP address for the target? (4) Is a socket bound to a bogus address 100% unreachable?
Internally, .bind maps directly to .on in the current version of jQuery. (The same goes for .live.) So there is a tiny but practically insignificant performance hit if you use .bind instead. However, .bind may be removed from future versions at any time. There is no reason to keep using .bind and every reason to prefer .on instead.
